3 edition of Evolving discretionary practices of U.S. antidumping activity found in the catalog.
Evolving discretionary practices of U.S. antidumping activity
Bruce A. Blonigen
|Statement||Bruce A. Blonigen.|
|Series||NBER working paper series -- no. 9625., Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 9625.|
|Contributions||National Bureau of Economic Research.|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||34 p. :|
|Number of Pages||34|
Anti-Dumping Duty: An anti-dumping duty is a protectionist tariff that a domestic government imposes on foreign imports that it believes are priced below fair market value. Dumping is a process Author: Will Kenton. Dumping and Anti-Dumping in International Trade Origins, Legal Nature, and Evolution Developments in Brazil and in the United States Luiz Claudio Duarte University of Georgia School of Law This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works and Organizations at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been.
Bruce A. Blonigen, NBER and University of Oregon, "Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity" Andrew B. Bernard, NBER and Dartmouth College; J. Brandford Jensen, Institute for International Economics; and Peter K. Schott, NBER and Yale University, "Falling Trade Costs, Heterogeneous Firms, and Industry Dynamics". chemical products (either generally or from the U.S.). India’s antidumping has been largely aimed at other developing nations, with apparently little impact on U.S. exports. For years India had a very restrictive import regime. Panagariya (, p. 85) notes: Until , an import policy was issued every six months in the form of the so-.
The U.S. international trade commission. What is the practice that allows officials to disregard instances in which foreign firms charged prices over fair value? Zeroing. Which countries use anti dumping laws 5 to 20 times more often than the United States? Argentina, Brazil, India and South Africa. Trade Policy Developments: Countries: Resources.
Optical system contamination
National Harbors Improvement and Maintenance Act of 1981
Juan Gris, his life and work.
Program for technical assistance in the analysis of land resources
The Therapeutics of hypertension
Brightmans predictions and prophecies
Address of Hon. A.D. Briggs, Mayor of the City of Springfield, to the City Council, January 7, 1867.
Sex, Symbolism, and Psychology in Literature
Buddhism in Daily Life
Seeking help from management consultants.
Observations on the new militia bill
theory of vision.
Glacier project papers
The analysis finds that the upward trend in U.S. dumping margins is primarily through evolving discretionary practices at the USDOC, with little or no role for changing country composition of investigated cases or legal changes. In par-ticular, the USDOC’s use Cited by: Importantly, the evolving effect of discretionary practices is due not only to increasing use of these practices over time, but apparent changes in implementation of these practices that mean a higher increase in the dumping margin whenever they are applied.
upward trend in U.S. dumping margins is prim arily through evolving discretionary practices at the USDOC, with little or no role for changing count ry composition of investigated cases or legal. Using quarterly digit HS-level export data for products involved in U.S.
antidumping cases we find that antidumping actions increase the hazard rate by more than 50%. Importantly, the evolving effect of discretionary practices is due not only to increasing use of these practices over time, but to apparent changes in implementation of these practices that mean a higher increase in the dumping margin whenever they are applied.
Previous literature has discussed the procedural biases that exist in U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC) dumping margin calculations. This paper examines the evolution of discretionary practices and their role in the rapid increase in average USDOC dumping margins since Bruce A.
Blonigen (), ‘Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 39 (3), August, – Chad P.
Bown and Thomas J. Prusa (), ‘U.S. Anti-dumping: Much Ado about Zeroing’, in. Blonigen, B.A. Evolving discretionary practices of U.S. antidumping activity. Canadian Journal of Econom – CrossRef Google Scholar. Explaining the Rise in U.S.
Antidumping Activity Introduction Antidumping provisions have been a part of U.S. trade law for over eighty years, but have been prominent only in the past two decades.
Antidumping was such an obscure part of U.S. trade policy that there was virtually no economic research on it until the pioneering paper ofCited by: 4. The simple analytics of U.S. antidumping orders: Bureaucratic discretion, anti-importer bias, and the Byrd amendment One consequence of any tendency for the anti-importer bias in the implementation of U.S.
anti-dumping law to grow over Evolving discretionary practices of U.S. antidumping activity. NBER Working Paper National Cited by: Antidumping provisions have been a part of U.S. trade law for over eighty years, but have been prominent only in the past two decades.
Antidumping was such an obscure part of U.S. trade policy that there was virtually no economic research on the topic until the pioneering paper of Finger, Hall, and Nelson (). Since then, research on antidumping.
U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Data and Documentation This following are links to firm-specific data and documentation on U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty cases sincecollected by the author of this page, Bruce Blonigen, Department of Economics, University of Oregon, with the help of numerous student research assistants.
Get this from a library. Evolving discretionary practices of U.S. antidumping activity. [Bruce A Blonigen; National Bureau of Economic Research.].
This book is the first to bring together the actual practices and procedures in all the major users of anti-dumping. The countries surveyed include all the so-called "traditional" users (Australia, Canada, the EU, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States) as well as the leading "new" users (Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Korea, Mexico, and Turkey)/5(2).
Case-Level Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Protection for Sale Model. Carolyn L. Evans and Shane M. Sherlund 1. Bruce A., ``Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S.
Antidumping Activity,'' NBER Working Paper No.Irwin, Douglas, ``The Rise of U.S. Antidumping Actions in Historical Perspective,'' NBER Working Paper No. Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Reporting Suspicious Trade Activity If you have any suspicion of or information regarding suspected fraud or illegal trade activity, has established key partnerships with the U.S.
Department of Commerce, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Abstract. Antidumping is a legal statute that allows for a remedy to offset the effects of dumped imports. Antidumping has emerged as the preferred method of trade protection, accounting for more disputes than all the other trade statutes combined.
Antidumping, signaling and cheap talk Following any precompetition activities, Blonigen ng discretionary practices of u.s. antidumping activity. Canadian Journal of Economics, 39 (), pp.
Google Scholar. Blonigen and Brown, Cited by: 6. Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity Blonigen, Bruce A. “Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity.” Canadian Journal. The United States International Trade Commission is an independent, nonpartisan, quasi-judicial federal agency that fulfills a range of trade-related mandates.
We provide high-quality, leading-edge analysis of international trade issues to the President and the Congress. The Commission is a highly regarded forum for the adjudication of intellectual property and trade disputes.
Intervention analysis of the antidumping investigation on wooden bedroom furniture imports from China Yang Wan, a Changyou Sun, b Donald L. Grebner b a Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GAby: 7.paper updates a June analysis examining international data on antidumping activity to determine trends, compare U.S.
activity with that of other countries, and study claims made by various participants in the debate over U.S. policy. The June paper covered data through the end of The current paper updates the.B.A. Blonigen, "Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S.
Antidumping Activity," NBER Working Paper No.Apriland, forthcoming, Canadian Journal of Economics, documents the rapidly rising trend in U.S. antidumping duties and the sources of this trend.